Legal Opinion

McCarley v. McCarley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 29, 1976No. 90PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Justice.

I

The Court of Appeals held it proper for the trial court to set aside plaintiff’s attempted voluntary dismissal under General Statute 1A-1, Rule 41(a)(1) [hereinafter Rule _]. This much of its decision is correct.

This statement of our practice as it existed before the adoption of present Rule 41 occurs in 2 McIntosh, North Carolina Practice and Procedure § 1645 (2d ed. T. Wilson and J. Wilson 1956) :

While the plaintiff may generally elect to enter a non-suit, “to pay the costs and walk out of court,” in any case *112in which only his cause of action is to be determined, although it…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Cox v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Beattie v. Carolina Central RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  4. Rhein v. RheinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  5. Griffith v. GriffithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. North Street Ass'n v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Danielson v. CummingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Swygert v. SwygertCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Patterson v. DAC Corp. of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Maurice v. Hatterasman Motel Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API