Legal Opinion
Eudy v. Eudy
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided June 26, 1975No. 124PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Justice.
Plaintiff contends that the Court of Appeals erred in granting a new trial because her complaint failed to allege that either she or defendant were residents of the State of North Carolina for six months next preceding the filing of her complaint.
G.S. 50-8, in part, provides that in all actions for divorce plaintiff shall set forth in his or her complaint that complainant or defendant has been a resident of the State of North Carolina for at least six months next preceding filing of the complaint. Prior to the enactment of Chapter 590 of the 1951 Session Laws, the Court…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Roberts v. William N. & Kate B. Reynolds Mem. ParkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Gerard M. Monod and Alys Monod v. Futura, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Highlands, Inc., a Colorado Corporation, and Whipple Van Ness JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- George J. Gallon v. The Lloyd-Thomas Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
- Simms v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 53 PeoplesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Quick v. QuickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- In re T.R.P.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
- Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Strickland v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.