Legal Opinion

Beall v. Beall

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 29, 1976No. 122PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, Chief Justice.

Upon conflicting allegations and evidence the trial judge found that “plaintiff was without substantial fault in her relationship with defendant”; that defendant had been guilty of specified marital misconduct which entitled plaintiff to permanent alimony; that during the marriage “plaintiff had been actually substantially dependent upon defendant for her support,” and he has “customarily provided most of the funds” for the support of his wife and children. In accordance with defendant’s admission in the answer, and his stipulation at trial, the judge found plaintiff to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Eudy v. EudySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Sayland Ex Rel. McLendon v. SaylandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Conrad v. ConradSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Joyner v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Rock v. BallouSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Coble v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Quick v. QuickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Plott v. PlottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API