Legal Opinion
United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Tambone
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided January 27, 2006No. 05-10247-NMGPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
GORTON, District Judge.
In this case, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) alleges that the defendants, James Tam-bone (“Tambone”) and Robert Hussey (“Hussey”): 1) committed fraud in violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“the Exchange Act”) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, 2) committed fraud in violation of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, 3) aided and abetted fraud in violation of Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“the Advisers Act”) and 4) aided and abetted in violation of Section 15(c) of the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Aaron v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. BrownDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. SteffesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
- Securities Exchange Commission v. DurgarianDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
- In Re Mutual Funds Inv. LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2007
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. TamboneDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.