Legal Opinion

Aaron v. Securities & Exchange Commission

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 2, 1980No. 79-66PublishedCited by 758 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart

The issue in this case is whether the Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission) is required to establish scienter as an element of a civil enforcement action to enjoin violations of § 17 (a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (1933 Act), § 10 (b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (1934 Act), and Commission Rule 10b-5 promulgated under that section of the 1934 Act.

I

When the events giving rise to this enforcement proceeding occurred, the petitioner was a managerial employee at E. L. Aaron & Co. (the firm), a registered broker-dealer with its principal office in New York City. Among other…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by758 opinions

  1. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Rubin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Securities and Exchange Commission v. First Jersey Securities, Inc. And Robert E. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  5. Bob Jones University v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

753 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API