Legal Opinion
Weinstein v. Weinstein
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided October 4, 2005No. SC 17097PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The plaintiff, Nancy Weinstein, appeals, following our grant of certification,1 from the judgment of the Appellate Court, affirming the judgment of the trial court. Weinstein v. Weinstein, 79 Conn. App. 638, 830 A.2d 1134 (2003). The trial court had denied the plaintiffs application for a rule to show cause requesting that the court open and vacate the judgment dissolving her marriage to the defendant, Luke A. Weinstein, on the ground that the stipulation on which the judgment was based was the result of a fraudulent misrepresentation by the defendant. On appeal to this court,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Monroe v. MonroeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Billington v. BillingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Miller v. ApplebySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Macomber v. Travelers Property & Casualty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Chapman Lumber, Inc. v. TagerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- McLaughlin v. CitiMortgage, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- Nazami v. Patrons Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Weiss v. WeissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Reiner, Reiner & Bendett, P.C. v. Cadle Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.