Legal Opinion
Bernstein v. Nemeyer
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 13, 1990No. 13823PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The principal issue in this case is whether investors in a speculative real estate venture are entitled to rescission and restitution of their investments upon breach of a “negative cash flow guaranty” *666contained in their partnership agreement. The plaintiffs1 brought this action against the defendants Ronald J. Nemeyer and Cheshire Management Company, Inc., who are the general partners of CMC-Southwest Limited Partnership, to recover for the loss of the amounts that the plaintiffs, as limited partners, had contributed to the partnership. The complaint charged the defendants, in three counts,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Randall v. LoftsgaardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Kavarco v. T. J. E., Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- Favorite v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Connell v. ColwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Horton v. HortonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1997
- Skuzinski v. Bouchard Fuels, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- O & G Industries, Inc. v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Hallas v. Boehmke & Dobosz, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.