In re Carrier IQ, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT
(Docket No. 304)
EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs in this multidistrict litigation— eighteen (18) individuals from thirteen different states — have filed a second consolidated amended complaint (“SCAC” or “Complaint”) against Defendant Carrier IQ, Inc. and a number of manufacturers of mobile devices. The Complaint alleges that Defendants have violated the Federal Wiretap Act as well as a number of state’s privacy and consumer protection statutes…
2Cases cited150 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- In re Nexus 6P Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- In re Rust-Oleum Restore Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Ecodiesel Mktg.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Corcoran v. CVS Health Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- In re Anthem, Inc. Data Breach LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.