Legal Opinion

Pasadena Junior College District v. Board of Supervisors

California Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1932No. Docket No. S.F. 14668PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

This is an original proceeding in mandamus to compel the defendants to levy, assess and extend a tax sufficient to repay the plaintiff junior college districts, moneys expended by them during the school year, 1930-1931, for educating pupils residing in the county of Los Angeles but not in any junior college district.

The plaintiffs are junior college districts organized under the laws of the state of California and the trustees of the respective districts. During the school year 1930-1931, each of the plaintiff junior college districts received in their junior colleges and educated therein,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Louisiana Ex Rel. Hubert v. Mayor and Council of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Hughes v. EwingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Esberg v. BadaraccoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Chesebrough v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Board of Education v. Common CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. American Securities Co. v. ForwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. McAlpine v. BaumgartnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Crow v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Morro Hills Community Services District v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Foothill Junior College District v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API