Legal Opinion

American Securities Co. v. Forward

California Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1934No. Docket No. S.F. 14958PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

A hearing was granted in this case in order to give further consideration to the question whether the statute imposes a mandatory duty to levy a tax sufficient to cover past due principal and interest on the bonds as well as that to become due prior to the next annual levy. We hereby adopt the following portion of our former opinion as a proper statement of facts and determination of other issues:

“Mandate to compel either the respondent city council of the city of San Diego or the respondent board of supervisors of the county of San Diego to levy, at the time of the next general tax…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Price v. Sixth District Agricultural Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Klemm v. DavenportSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  3. State Ex Rel. Buckwalter v. City of LakelandSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  4. Norris v. Montezuma Valley Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
  5. Gates v. SweitzerIllinois Supreme Court · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Armstrong v. Sewer Improvement Dist. No. 1Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  3. County of Los Angeles v. RockholdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Southern California Telephone Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Municipal Investors Assn. v. BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API