Legal Opinion

Crow v. Board of Supervisors

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 25, 1933No. Docket No. 5055PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

This proceeding is before us upon an appeal by the petitioner from a judgment of dismissal entered in the trial court, after sustaining a demurrer to the appellant’s petition for a writ of review without leave to amend.

The proceeding was instituted in the court below for the purpose of having set aside and annulled the order of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Stanislaus adopting a budget for the fiscal year 1933-1934, and fixing a tax rate to be levied upon the taxable property of said county.

The petition sets forth that the appellant is a resident, property owner and taxpayer of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Whitmore v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. Andrews, Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Boskowitz v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Hughson v. CraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. McCabe v. CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Eisley v. MohanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Community Development Commission v. County of VenturaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Kentfield v. Reclamation BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Holmes Investment Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Eisley v. MohanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API