Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Esberg v. Badaracco

California Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1927No. Docket No. S.F. 12678PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This is an original application for a writ of mandate by the Board of Education of the City and County of San Francisco to compel the respondents, as members of and constituting the Board of Supervisors of said city and county, to include in its proposed tax ordinance for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1928, such levy of taxes for school purposes as will produce the sum of $7,621,529, exclusive of amounts required for redemption of school bonds or interest thereon.

There is no dispute as to the facts. Within the time prescribed by law the board of education prepared its budget setting forth…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Hancock v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. McCabe v. CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Los Angeles School Dist. v. LongdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Board of Education v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Hall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Butterworth v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. City of Pasadena v. CharlevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Adams v. WolffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Kelso v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API