McAlpine v. Baumgartner
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.
From the record herein, the fact is disclosed that by the various provisions of article XXXIV which includes sections 500 to 513, inclusive, of the charter of the city of Los Angeles, a retirement system for specified classes of employees of said city was created. Therein, after provision had been made to the effect that the management and control of said system should be vested in and entrusted to a “Board of Administration”, and in connection with the duties of said board, that annually it should prepare a budget, which among other things, should show the financial necessities for the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. DicksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
- Dufton v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- People ex rel. Pierce v. MorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- American Securities Co. v. ForwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Forbes v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- County of Sacramento v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- City of National City v. FritzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Ivens v. SimonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- United Firefighters v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Leftridge v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.