Legal Opinion

Foothill Junior College District v. Board of Supervisors

California Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1962No. S. F. 20649PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.

This appeal presents the question of the rights of the parties with respect to surplus tax funds collected in plaintiff district by defendants to pay tuition to certain other junior college districts.

There is no dispute as to the facts. Pursuant to an election, plaintiff district was established on July 1, 1957. During the school year July 1, 1956, to June 30, 1957, residents in plaintiff district sent their children to junior colleges outside of the district area. Under the then law, the county in which the nonjunior college district area was situated was required to impose a special tax on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People Ex Rel. Averna v. City of Palm SpringsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Pomona City School District v. PayneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. American Securities Co. v. ForwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Otis v. Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. County of Tuolumne v. RaffertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Foothill Junior College District v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State ex rel. Cranston v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API