Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Ewing

California Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1892No. 14441PublishedCited by 47 opinions

Appeal from, a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The board of supervisors of Fresno *417County, on September 6, 1890, changed the boundaries of Fresno City school district by excluding therefrom certain lands described in the complaint herein, and transferring the same to other districts. Prior to that date, the electors of the district had voted to raise the sum of six thousand dollars for the purpose of building a school-house, but the trustees of the district did not certify the fact to the supervisors until the 23d of September, 1890. Thereafter, on the first Monday of October, the supervisors, at the time of levying the county taxes,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commissioners of Laramie County v. COMMISSIONERS OF ALBANY COUNTYSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Moss v. ShearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Bates v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Town of Depere v. Town of BellevueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Richards v. DaggetMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Santa Clara County Local Transportation Authority v. GuardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Fullerton Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Crabb v. Celeste Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Kennedy v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API