Hutchinson Co. v. Coughlin
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBrittain, J.
The defendant appeals from a judgment foreclosing the lien of a street assessment on her four lots in Oakland.
The assessment proceedings were under the Street Improvement Act of 1911 as originally adopted. The work was grading, curbing, macadamizing, and guttering one block on Brooklyn Avenue, between Lake Shore Boulevard and Newton Avenue, one block on Wesley Avenue, between Lake Shore Boulevard and Newton Avenue, and the crossing formed by the intersection of Brooklyn, Newton, and Wesley Avenues, in the city of Oakland. Newton Avenue and Lake Shore Boulevard are approximately parallel, and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Patterson v. Colorado Ex Rel. Attorney General of Colo.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Spring Street Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hannon v. MaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Beck v. Ransome-Crummey Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Maxwell v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- City of Plymouth v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Butters v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.