Butters v. City of Oakland
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
The plaintiffs in this action sought to enjoin the recordation of a certain assessment for street improvements in the city of Oakland done under the district plan provided for by the terms of the “Improvement Act of 1911” [Stats. 1911, p. 730]. The same assessment was before the supreme court in the case of Rockridge Place v. City of Oakland, 178 Cal. 58, [172 Pac. 1110], in which case the facts were quite fully stated and a number of the points discussed on this appeal were decided. It will be only necessary, therefore, to refer to such of the facts of the case as may be germane to the legal…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Reardon v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Lent v. TillsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Spring Street Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Eachus v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chester v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Clay v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Foley Brothers, Inc. v. MarshallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Bass v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1922
- Butters v. City of OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.