City of Plymouth v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JANES, J.
The City of Plymouth (hereinafter “petitioner”) seeks a peremptory writ prohibiting respondent superior court from proceeding further with an action brought against petitioner by real parties in interest, who are property owners. Their suit against petitioner alleges that their property, which has been assessed to pay for municipal improvement bonds, will receive no benefit from said improvements.
After commencement of the property owners’ action and service of process upon petitioner, petitioner nevertheless issued and sold the bonds. This application for a writ of prohibition…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Duncan v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Milheim v. Moffat Tunnel Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wilson & Wilson v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Robinson v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Kaiser Steel Corp. v. County of SolanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Leslie's Pool Mart, Inc. v. Department of Food & AgricultureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Fremont Union High School District v. Santa Clara County Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.