Legal Opinion

Maxwell v. City of Santa Rosa

California Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1959No. Sac. 6923PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

Plaintiffs are the owners of parcels of land included in an assessment district created by defendant city for the purpose of grading, clearing, paving and improving Pacific Avenue, a street in the city of Santa Rosa. Defendants are the city and the individual members of the city council. Plaintiffs instituted this action to enjoin the enforcement of assessments against their respective properties and to obtain a determination that the assessment proceedings are null and void, upon the grounds that the city council acted in an arbitrary and fraudulent manner, inconsistent with due process, and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Boren v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Fascination, Inc. v. HooverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Spring Street Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Bolton v. GilleranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Hannon v. MaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. City and County of San Francisco v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. City Council v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Gogerty v. Coachella Valley Junior College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Noonan v. RousselotCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Jeffery v. City of SalinasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API