Beck v. Ransome-Crummey Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBrittain, J.
Fred Beck, with thirty-one other property owners of San Jose, obtained a judgment against the Ransome-Crummey Co. and the city treasurer of that city quieting the title to their respective lands as against any claim of lien, and enjoining the issuance of bonds, based upon work done by the Ransome-Crummey Co., under proceedings taken by the city council, for paving and otherwise improving North Thirteenth Street in San Jose from Santa Clara Street to the northerly limits of the city. The defendants appeal. The city treasurer has no personal interest in the controversy.
The appellants do not…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Galpin v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Simon v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Ochoa v. Hernandez Y MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- O. T. Johnson Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Hall v. Fairchild-Gilmore-Wilton Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Claude Fisher Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
- Brydon v. City of Hermosa BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Hutchinson Co. v. CoughlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.