Legal Opinion

Baum v. Aleman

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 8, 1956No. Civ. A. 27PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiffs adjudging that the plaintiffs take nothing by virtue of their complaint and that the defendant recover from them the sum of $2,042 on a cross-complaint.

On December 5, 1952, the defendant purchased an automobile from the plaintiffs under a written contract specifying a total cash price of $2,230.80. This contract recited a total down payment of $788.80 which consisted of a recited cash payment of $388.80 and a trade-in allowance of $400. The evidence showed that the purchaser was unable to make the cash…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Estrada v. AlvarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Whyte v. RosencrantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Harris v. BarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. United States Credit Bureau, Inc. v. SandersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stasher v. Harger-HaldemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. KyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. City Lincoln-Mercury Co. v. LindseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Lewis v. Muntz Car Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Williams v. Caruso Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API