Legal Opinion

Estrada v. Alvarez

California Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1952No. L. A. 21515PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment for defendant entered after a demurrer to their third amended complaint “ (For Rescission and Money Paid Under Void Contract) ” had been sustained without leave to amend. The action grew out of a contract of conditional sale of a truck and trailer to plaintiffs, and defendant’s repossession of the vehicles. Plaintiffs contend that they have stated three causes of action: (1—“For Rescission”) : They were induced to enter into the contract by fraud of defendant, they paid certain sums on account of the contract, defendant has received back everything he…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Steiner v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Orloff v. Metropolitan Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Campbell v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Ferguson v. EdgarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marina View Heights Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Stasher v. Harger-HaldemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. KyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Keyes v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API