Williams v. Caruso Enterprises, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPatrosso, J.
Plaintiff instituted this action to recover money paid by him on account of the purchase price of an automobile under a conditional sales contract which it is alleged did not conform to the requirements of Civil Code, section 2982. Defendants’ answer to plaintiff’s complaint, in addition to a denial of the material allegations thereof, set up a counterclaim or offset for the reasonable value of the use of the automobile while in the possession of the plaintiff, which was alleged to be $7.00 per day or the total sum of $2,030. Upon the trial it was stipulated that the reasonable rental value…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Domestic & Foreign Petroleum Co. v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Pollak v. StauntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Western Oil & Refining Co. v. Venago Oil Corp.California Supreme Court · 1933
- Comet Theatre Enterprises, Inc. v. CartwrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. KyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Nelson v. Pearson Ford Co.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- City Lincoln-Mercury Co. v. LindseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Brown v. HornsteinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Lewis v. Muntz Car Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.