Harris v. Barlow
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWilbub, J.
This is an action in ejectment. Judgment was for the defendants, and plaintiffs appeal. Plaintiffs’ alleged title is based upon a deed, executed, signed, and acknowledged while still in blank, in which, in pursuance of an oral authorization thereto, the notary inserted the names of the parties and the description of the property after the grantors had left, and during their absence. This deed was retained by him' in escrow and it is claimed that by reason of the transaction between the parties it was in effect delivered. While still in the possession of the escrow-holder, the grantors in said…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Upton v. ArcherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
3Cited by12 opinions
- Trout v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Argyle v. SlemakerIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Jones v. CoulterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Cavalli v. LuckettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Dahlberg v. Johnson's EstateIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.