Legal Opinion
Carmona v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 9, 2008No. AC 29394PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
The petitioner, Nathaniel Carmona, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner essentially claims that the respondent, the commissioner of correction, improperly calculated his effective date of release from incarceration. Because the petitioner has been released from the respondent’s custody, we dismiss the appeal as moot.
The following relevant facts are not in dispute. “On November 30, 2000, the [petitioner] was arrested for sale of narcotics in violation of General Statutes § 2 la-277 (a). He was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Loisel v. RoweSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Harris v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Segal v. SegalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. CarmonaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Ruffin v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
3Cited by4 opinions
- Patterson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- In Re Earl B.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Davison v. Mohegan Tribe Election CommitteeMohegan Trial Court · 2008
- In Re Earl B.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010