Legal Opinion
In Re Earl B.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 18, 2010No. AC 30491PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The respondent, Earl B., appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence. On appeal, he claims that the sentencing court exceeded its statutory authority by imposing that portion of his agreed on sentence that banished him from New Haven County for forty-two months. Specifically, the respondent argues that the court, in accepting his plea agreement, exceeded its authority pursuant to General Statutes § 46b-140 (i)1 in two ways. *271First he claims that the court extended the maximum length of the sentence allowed under the statute from…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Loisel v. RoweSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. CasianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- In re William D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. BoyleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Earl B.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- In Re Earl B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- In re Earl B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010