Legal Opinion

Segal v. Segal

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 24, 2003No. SC 16604PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PALMER, J.

The primary issue raised by this certified appeal is whether a foreign judgment is enforceable, pursuant to the Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act (act), General Statutes §§ 52-604 through 52-609,1 in this state while that judgment is on appeal even *501though the judgment debtor has failed to provide the security required under the law of the foreign state in accordance with General Statutes § 52-606 (a).2 We conclude that such a judgment is enforceable under these circumstances. Inasmuch as the Appellate Court reached a contrary conclusion, we reverse the judgment of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Giaimo v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  2. State v. GibbsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  3. Vibert v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  4. McCulloch v. JeakinsNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Segal v. SegalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. LuttersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. Carmel Hollow Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Town of BethlehemSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  3. Wiseman v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB v. CharlesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  5. Cox v. AikenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API