Legal Opinion
Harris v. Commissioner of Correction
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 30, 2004No. SC 17078PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZARELLA, J.
The principal issue presented by this appeal is whether the petitioner, Randy Harris, was entitled by General Statutes § 18-98d 1 to have each of his two concurrent sentences, which were imposed on different dates, reduced by the same calendar days of presentence confinement credit, which he had accrued simultaneously while held in lieu of bond under two separate dockets. We conclude that he was not, and, accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the habeas court.
The petitioner commenced this action by filing a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus. 2 The petitioner…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Crawford v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Batte-Holmgren v. Commissioner of Public HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Washington v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Johnson v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Oliphant v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.