Legal Opinion

In Re Earl B.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 18, 2010No. AC 30491Published

1Opinion of the Court

994 A.2d 713 (2010)

121 Conn.App. 269

In re EARL B.[*]

No. 30491.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Argued November 17, 2009.

Decided May 18, 2010.

James Jude Connolly, supervisory assistant public defender, for the appellant (respondent).

Melissa L. Streeto, assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, were Michael Dearington, state's attorney, and Cathleen Edwards, supervisory juvenile prosecutor, for the appellee (state).

BISHOP, ALVORD and FOTI, Js.

FOTI, J.

The respondent, Earl B., appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence. On appeal, he…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Loisel v. RoweSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  4. State v. CasianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  5. In re William D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API