Legal Opinion

Hoag v. Kansas Independent Laundry Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 12, 1923No. 24,469PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*514The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one for compensation. Judgment was rendered for the defendant on the opening statement of counsel for plaintiffs, and they appeal.

The material portion of the opening statement follows:

“Mr. Hoag was at that time a man of about 54 years of age; he had always enjoyed good health, and up to the time of sustaining this injury was in good health; he had been employed as engineer for a number of years, and had been employed by the Kansas Independent Laundry Company, the defendant herein, for a number of years as engineer; as a part of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gilliland v. Ash Grove Lime & Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  2. Linnane v. Aetna Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  3. Monson v. BattelleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  4. Bayne v. Riverside Storage & Cartage Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Gilliland v. Edgar Zinc Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1922

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Malone v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Echord v. RushSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  3. Slade v. Willis Hosiery MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Taylor v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. Winkelman v. Boeing Airplane Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1949

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API