Legal Opinion

Gilliland v. Edgar Zinc Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 7, 1922No. 23,911PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

DawsoN, J.:

The plaintiff brought this action for compensation for the death of her husband, an employee of the defendant company, who, as she alleged, became overheated on a warm afternoon while hauling ashes from defendant’s smelting plant, and who while so overheated drank ice water and was'Seized with acute congestion and died the same afternoon.

The evidence tended to show these facts. The arbitrator found that the defendant and its deceased employee were working under the compensation act; and—

“III. That the employment of the said S. H. Gilliland…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cox v. Kansas City Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Pinkston v. Rice Motor Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  2. Meyer v. RoetteleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Echord v. RushSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  4. Hoag v. Kansas Independent Laundry Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. McCormick ex rel. McCormick v. Central Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API