Legal Opinion

Echord v. Rush

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 10, 1927No. 26,950PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

'The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

In the former opinion filed in this case (122 Kan. 260, 251 Pac. 1112) the judgment of the court below was reversed, with directions to enter judgment for defendant, the court holding that the case was controlled by the rule of law stated in Shade v. Cement Co., 92 Kan. 146, 139 Pac. 1193; 93 Kan. 257, 144 Pac. 249, and allied cases. A rehearing was granted. The case has been reargued, *522additional briefs have been filed, and we have sent for and examined the papers and transcript filed in the court below. Upon this further consideration we…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Gilliland v. Ash Grove Lime & Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  2. Moeser v. ShunkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  3. Cox v. Kansas City Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  4. Shade v. Ash Grove Lime & Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  5. Shade v. Ash Grove Lime & Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. MatlockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  2. Lessley v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  3. Bright v. BraggSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  4. S.H. Kress Co. v. Superior Court of Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Duncan v. Perry Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1946

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API