Slade v. Willis Hosiery Mills
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
Did Jack Slade’s death result from an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment? We agree with the judge of the Superior Court the evidence is not such as to permit an affirmative inference.
By the terms of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, “death” means only death resulting from an injury, and “injury” means only “injury by accident” arising out of and in the course of the employment, and does not include a disease in any form, except where it results naturally and unavoidably from the accident. C. S., 8081 (i). “Accident” as here used has been defined “as an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Victory Sparkler & Specialty Co. v. FrancksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
- Conrad v. Cook-Lewis Foundry Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Matter of Lerner v. Rump Bros.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
- McNeely v. Carolina Asbestos Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Hoag v. Kansas Independent Laundry Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Harding v. THOMAS AND HOWARD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Hunsucker v. High Point Bending & Chair Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Cole v. GUILFORD COUNTY AND HARTFORD ACC. & IND. CO.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Harris v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Hensley v. Farmers Federation Co-OperativeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.