Legal Opinion
Malone v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 22, 1942No. 28932PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The chief question to be decided in this case is whether heat prostration, suffered by a workman as a result of contact with artificial heat incident to his employment and causing his death, is a com pensable injury under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.
Article II, Section 35 of the Constitution, provides, ■among other things, that: “For the purpose of providing compensation to workmen and their dependents, for death, injuries or occupational disease, occasioned in the course of such workmen’s employment, laws may be passed * #
Pursuant to this constitutional provision, the Legislature of this…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Lewis v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Western Commercial Travelers' Ass'n v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
- Bryant v. Continental Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1916
- Matter of Connelly v. Hunt Furniture Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- McCrone v. Bank One Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2005
- McNees v. Cincinnati Street Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
- Sebek v. Cleveland Graphite Bronze Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
- Village v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
- Swanton v. StringerOhio Supreme Court · 1975
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.