Legal Opinion

Gargasz v. Nordson Corp.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 30, 1991No. 90CA004912PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reece, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant, Ted. J. Gargasz, claims that he was wrongfully discharged by the defendant-appellee, Nordson Corporation. He appeals from the decision of the trial court granting summary judgment in favor of Nordson Corp. The only issue on appeal is whether there exists any triable issues of fact.

Gargasz was employed by Nordson Corp. from June 11, 1979 until he was involuntarily terminated on October 27, 1987. At no time did the parties execute a written contract defining the duration or terms of their employment relationship. 1 While Gargasz held various positions with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Mers v. Dispatch Printing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Joyce v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Henkel v. Educational Research Council of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Manofsky v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Shaw v. J. Pollock & Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Penwell v. Amherst HospitalOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Rudy v. Loral Defense SystemsOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Srail v. RJF International Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Cohen v. G/C Contracting Corp., 2006 Ca 102 (9-21-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API