Legal Opinion

Manofsky v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 3, 1990No. 14548PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cacioppo, Judge.

This appeal questions whether summary judgment was properly granted in this employer/employee dispute. Appellant, Robert Manofsky, maintains that triable questions of fact exist on all the essential elements of his claims of age discrimination, sex discrimination, and wrongful discharge. He further protests that summary judgment was granted before discovery could be adequately conducted. We disagree and affirm the trial court’s judgment in favor of appellee, Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (“Goodyear”).

Although the parties disagree on almost every aspect, of this case, a few…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Needham v. the Provident BankOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Springfield Local School District Board of Education v. Ohio Ass'n of Public School Employees, Local 530Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Thatcher v. Goodwill Industries of AkronOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Ekstrom v. Cuyahoga County Community CollegeOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Georgeoff v. O'BrienOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API