Legal Opinion
Srail v. RJF International Corp.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 20, 1998No. 72050PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Spellacy, Presiding Judge.
Defendant-appellant/cross-appellee RJF International Corporation (“RJF”) appeals from the jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs-appellees/cross-appellants Raymond C. Srail and Richard Glover in an age discrimination lawsuit.
RJF assigns the following errors for review:
“I. The trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion for judgment at [the] close of plaintiffs’ case and in submitting the issue of liability to the jury because plaintiffs were unable to establish a prima facie case of age discrimination under Ohio law.
“II. The trial court erred in submitting the…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Allied Erecting & Dismantling Co. v. City of YoungstownOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
- Morgan v. New York Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Norbuta v. Loctite Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Breezevale Ltd. v. DickinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Kassay v. Niederst Mgmt., Ltd., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.