Legal Opinion

Srail v. RJF International Corp.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 1998No. 72050PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Spellacy, Presiding Judge.

Defendant-appellant/cross-appellee RJF International Corporation (“RJF”) appeals from the jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs-appellees/cross-appellants Raymond C. Srail and Richard Glover in an age discrimination lawsuit.

RJF assigns the following errors for review:

“I. The trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion for judgment at [the] close of plaintiffs’ case and in submitting the issue of liability to the jury because plaintiffs were unable to establish a prima facie case of age discrimination under Ohio law.
“II. The trial court erred in submitting the…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Allied Erecting & Dismantling Co. v. City of YoungstownOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Morgan v. New York Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  3. Norbuta v. Loctite Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  4. Breezevale Ltd. v. DickinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Kassay v. Niederst Mgmt., Ltd., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API