Legal Opinion

Shaw v. J. Pollock & Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 30, 1992No. 15542PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reece, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant, Robert Shaw, claims that he was wrongfully discharged by the defendants-appellees, J. Pollock & Company et al., from his position at Steel Products of Massillon (“Steel Products”). He appeals from the decision of the trial court granting summary judgment in favor of the appellees. We affirm.

Shaw was employed by Steel Products from January 31, 1990, until he was terminated on April 6, 1990. Shaw had business dealings with the forerunner of Steel Products, Massillon Spring & Rivet Co. When Jerry Pollock purchased Steel Products, he needed someone to manage the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Mers v. Dispatch Printing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Dohme v. Eurand America, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Thatcher v. Goodwill Industries of AkronOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Klesch v. ReidOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Kraft Construction Co. v. Cuyahoga County Board of CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Condon v. Body, Vickers & DanielsOhio Court of Appeals · 1994

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API