Rudy v. Loral Defense Systems
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Reece, Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant, Larry Rudy, claims that he was wrongfully discharged from his position with the defendant-appellee, Loral Defense Systems (“Loral”). He appeals the trial court’s decision granting summary judgment in Loral’s favor. We affirm.
In 1982, Rudy began work as a plant engineer for Goodyear Aerospace Corporation, Loral’s predecessor in interest. When Loral bought Aerospace in 1987, it began to reduce the work force at Rudy’s plant. Rudy was placed on recallable, layoff status. Loral asserts that Rudy’s recall rights consisted of placing him on recallable, layoff…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Carrie Braun v. Ultimate JetchartersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Baker v. the Buschman CompanyOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- Mitnaul v. Fairmount Presbyterian ChurchOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
- Thatcher v. Goodwill Industries of AkronOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- Gouge v. BAX Global, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.