Lindow v. Cohn
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County and from an order denying a new trial. J. W. Ma-hon, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Jellett & Meyerstein, and George E. Whitaker, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The facts as they appear from the record are: That one Peiser, as traveling salesman and soliciting agent of Meyerstein Company, plaintiff’s assignor, sold to defendant a lot of merchandise, consisting of corduroy trousers, and on behalf of his principal made covenants of warranty as to the quality of the goods. Some six weeks after the goods had been received and paid for by defendant, Peiser again called upon defendant, soliciting further orders for his house, when defendant for the first time made complaint, stating that the corduroy trousers were not as he had represented them; that every…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Puget Sound Lumber Co. v. KrugCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Chambers v. ShortSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
3Cited by7 opinions
- T. W. & L. O. Naylor Co. v. BowmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
- Pacific Bone, Coal & Fertilizer Co. v. BleakmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Burroughs Adding Machine Co. v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Tynan Lumber Co. v. W. A. Hammond Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Leland v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.