Legal Opinion

Pacific Bone, Coal & Fertilizer Co. v. Bleakmore

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 1927No. Docket No. 3111PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

Plaintiff had judgment against the defendant Lea Bleakmore, and the defendant Helen Bleak-more had judgment against the plaintiff. Plaintiff thereupon moved the trial court to vacate the judgment in favor of the defendant Helen Bleakmore, and to enter judgment against said defendant in favor of the plaintiff. This motion was denied. From this order and from the judgment in favor of the defendant Helen Bleakmore the plaintiff appeals.

Lea Bleakmore and Helen Bleakmore are husband and wife, residing in Lake County. Helen Bleakmore owns a pear orchard situate in the county of Lake. Her husband,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Puget Sound Lumber Co. v. KrugCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Brown v. RouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Hall v. E. W. Wells & SonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  4. King v. LagrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Duerr v. Sloan.California Court of Appeal · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rakestraw v. RodriguesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Toth v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Watkins v. ClemmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Schomaker v. PetersenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Chismore v. Marion Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API