Legal Opinion

Chambers v. Short

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1883PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Pettis Circuit Court. — Hon. ¥k. T. Wood, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtHenry, J.

This is an action on account for twenty-five parts of Dope’s Gallery, at $1 per part, and for binding two volumes of the same at $12.50 per volume. The answer pleaded payment. The court tried the cause without *205a jury, and the finding and judgment were for defendant, and plaintiff' has appealed to this court.

The evidence for plaintiff was that the agent, who sold the books by subscription, had no authority to receive payment for them; that in August, 1878, plaintiff'received from defendant, by express, twenty-five parts of Doré’s G-allery with directions to add twenty-five other parts and bind…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Butler v. DormanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clark v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  2. Lindow v. CohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  3. H. T. Keown & Co. v. VogelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. Scarritt-Comstock Furniture Co. v. HudspethSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  5. Smith v. DroubayUtah Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API