Legal Opinion

Burroughs Adding Machine Co. v. Harris

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 26, 1929No. Docket No. 6673PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKoford, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff for the agreed purchase price of an adding machine. The machine was delivered to defendant about September 22, 1927, and was returned to the plaintiff October 1. The questions presented by the appeal are whether there was a contract of sale and, if so, was it canceled when the machine was returned?

C. A. Irons, a salesman working either for the plaintiff or for the Adding Machine Exchange store at 562 Market Street, San Francisco, obtained the signature of the defend-' ant to an order or contract made out upon a printed form which was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vitagraph, Inc. v. Liberty Theatres Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Thomas v. AnthonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  3. Sparks v. MaukCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Morton v. Albers Brothers Milling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. Lindow v. CohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Driver v. International Air Race Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Tynan Lumber Co. v. W. A. Hammond Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Golden West Credit & Adjustment Co. v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Stapran v. James H. Maden, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Traders Finance Corp. v. SandersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API