Legal Opinion
Tynan Lumber Co. v. W. A. Hammond Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 8, 1932No. Docket No. 8169PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
Plaintiff sued for the breach of an oral contract. The cause was tried without a jury and plaintiff had judgment from which the defendant Coddington Company has appealed on typewritten transcripts.
The complaint alleged that, on February 5, 1929, plaintiff and defendants made an agreement whereby plaintiff was appointed exclusive sales agent for the sale of “Ecod Fabric" in certain territory in Monterey and San Benito Counties; that in accordance with this agreement plaintiff purchased a carload of said fabric, paying defendants $4,000 therefor; that by the terms of said agreement, plaintiff…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thomas v. AnthonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Eldridge v. MowryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Morton v. Albers Brothers Milling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
- Lindow v. CohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Burroughs Adding Machine Co. v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
3Cited by4 opinions
- Myers v. StephensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Floor v. MitchellUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- George B. Leavitt Co. v. CouturierUtah Supreme Court · 1933
- Born v. KoopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962