Legal Opinion

Holden v. Ford Motor Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 22, 1998No. Docket 195440PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This case has been remanded by our Supreme Court for a second time, for consideration as on leave granted. Plaintiff Emaline Holden appeals a decision by the Worker’s Compensation Appellate Commission (wcac) on remand from this Court affirming the decision of the magistrate and denying benefits. We affirm.

Plaintiff’s decedent, Carl Holden, worked for defendant Ford Motor Company as supervisor of food services. The decedent managed three dining rooms and four cafeterias. In addition to planning and exe cuting daily meals, he was responsible for food services for executive dinners, company…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Kostamo v. Marquette Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Holden v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Goff v. Bil-Mar Foods, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Holden v. Ford Motor CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harris v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  2. Luster v. Five Star Carpet Installations, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Luster v. Five Star Carpet Installations, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API