Holden v. Ford Motor Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.
The question presented concerns the scope of administrative appellate review by the Workers’ Compensation Appellate Commission of a decision of a magistrate, and the scope of judicial appellate review on leave granted by the Court of Appeals or this Court.
We conclude that the wcac did not, on administrative appellate review, exceed its authority in reversing the decisions of the magistrates and in awarding benefits, and that the Court of Appeals panel in Holden 1 erred in reversing, and the panel in Weiss 2 did not err in affirming, the wcac.
I
Before the reforms enacted in 1985, 3 hearings in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Michigan Employment Relations Commission v. Detroit Symphony Orchestra, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Kostamo v. Marquette Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Aquilina v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Zaremba v. Chrysler CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Rowland v. Washtenaw County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
- Mudel v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Hagerman v. Gencorp AutomotiveMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Camburn v. Northwest School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.