Legal Opinion

Holden v. Ford Motor Company

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 23, 1990No. Docket 118813PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals by leave granted the Workers’ Compensation Appellate Commission’s order reversing the decision of the magistrate on the basis that his decision was not supported by competent, material, and substantial evidence on the whole record. In our order granting leave to appeal, this Court ordered the parties to address the following questions:(1) What is the standard by which the Court of Appeals reviews Workers’ Compensation Appellate Commission review of findings of fact made by the magistrate in this case and does it differ, if at all, from the standard by which the Court of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Michigan Employment Relations Commission v. Detroit Symphony Orchestra, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Kostamo v. Marquette Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Aquilina v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Johnson v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Miklik v. Michigan Special MacHine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Holden v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Aaron v. Michigan Boiler & EngineeringMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Connaway v. Welded Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Palmer v. ITT HancockMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Holden v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API