Legal Opinion

Goff v. Bil-Mar Foods, Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1997No. Docket Nos. 102865, 103634, Calendar Nos. 6-7PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallett, C.J.

In these combined cases, we must decide whether the Worker’s Compensation Appellate Commission acted within the proper scope of its reviewing power in concluding that the magistrates’ findings supporting the grant of benefits were not supported by competent, material, and substantial evidence on the whole record. In both cases, the WCAC reversed the magistrates’ awards and the Court of Appeals affirmed. We affirm in Goff and reverse in Dudley.

i

The questions presented concern the proper interpretation and scope of the “competent, material, and substantial evidence on the whole record” standard…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Michigan Employment Relations Commission v. Detroit Symphony Orchestra, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Holden v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Weems v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Sobotka v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Rowland v. Washtenaw County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  2. DiBenedetto v. West Shore HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Mudel v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Hoste v. Shanty Creek Management, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Hagerman v. Gencorp AutomotiveMichigan Supreme Court · 1998

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API