Legal Opinion

Kostamo v. Marquette Iron Mining Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1979No. Docket Nos. 56000, 56729, 56915, 56934, 57479. (Calendar Nos. 8-12)PublishedCited by 136 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

In these consolidated cases the workers had arteriosclerotic heart disease. Kostamo and Bullard had heart attacks and died. Jarman had a heart attack and lived. Fiszer and Hannula offered expert testimony that they had suffered heart attacks but the Worker’s Compensation Appeal Board found that they had not.

The WCAB denied compensation to all the claimants except Jarman who, it found, had suffered work-related heart damage and disability. We affirm, except in Kostamo, which we remand for further proceedings.

I

A

In Fiszer and Hannula, the issue was whether they had suffered heart damage. The…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Sentilles v. Inter-Caribbean Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. McAvoy v. H B Sherman Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Sheppard v. Michigan National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Aquilina v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Hlady v. Wolverine Bolt Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by136 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Trinity Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  2. Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Guidry v. Sline Indus. Painters, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  4. In Re BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Holden v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992

131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API