Legal Opinion

Harris v. Board of Education

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 6, 2003No. 43, Sept. Term, 2002PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELDRIDGE, Judge.

We issued a writ of certiorari in this workers’ compensation case for the purpose of reconsidering one particular line of this Court’s opinions which have held that, for an injury to be covered as an “accidental injury” under the Workers’ Compensation Act, Maryland Code (1991, 1999 RepLVoL), § 9-101 et seq. of the Labor and Employment Article, the injury must result from “unusual activity.” The “unusual activity” requirement is not supported by the language of the Workers’ Compensation Act, is contrary to other opinions by this Court, is a distinct minority view in the nation,…

2Cases cited97 opinions

  1. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  4. Kostamo v. Marquette Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Wolfgeher v. Wagner Cartage Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Haas v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Johnson v. Mayor & City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Montgomery County v. DeiblerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  4. Design Kitchen and Baths v. LagosCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. Unger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API